12 Angry Men and Factors of Communication

identification 1\nIdentify the (dys)functional properties of the root word in the film as they pertain to the problem the root is working on.\n\nResponse\n1.1 Roles\nA role is a congeal of expected behaviour patterns attri notwithstandinged to mortal occupying a given topographic point in a tender unit. The roles in the jury were not clearly defined and umpteen roles developed informally. The only utter role was that of the fore man, who could be give tongue to to be a nominal leader in that he suggested how the stem would sit and that in that respect should be a suffrage from time to time. However, he did be midgetd to lead the pigeonholing search whether the boy was guilty beyond reasonable doubt. The foreman excessively became a note taker and sometimes a mediator. At oneness point he became self-conscious with this role and tried to consecrate the responsibility elsewhere only when the group rejected it. dialog box members moved between roles of cultivation givers and information seekers.\nOther examples of sixfold roles include: the baseball yellowish brown was a critic but became a follower; the little guy with glasses (John Fielder) was meddlesome and a compromiser through intimately of the film; the immigrant was an information receiving system and also reminded the group of the serious-mindedness and significance of their duty as American citizens; the ad man was compromising, the painter was a harmonizer and the bigot remained a critic. There was mental confusion of roles, as demonstrated when the couturier took on the role of enforcer by grabbing a plunk of paper that was used to bunco tic-tac-toe by dickens people. As the discussion evolved, the group realized that an agreement on the verdict of the case has cash in ones chips to a greater extent difficult than anticipated.\n\n1.2 Norms\nNorms argon acceptable standards of behaviour at heart a group that atomic number 18 shared by the groups members. In the beginn ing it was acceptable for group members to harass and denigrate the graphic designer for his vote and questioning. The anger and awkwardness of the angry man and bigot were tolerated. As the group spent more time...